Skip to content
Agents tracked: 258 Downloads (7d): 219M up 6.1% GitHub stars: 5.5M VS Code installs: 148M Releases (7d): 293 Agent pull requests (last week): 937K Updated Oct 7, 2026
Case study OBI

How OBI handled peak-season service calls with Parloa voice agents

European home-improvement retailer OBI deployed Parloa voice agents in several countries to answer routine calls and route complex ones. Parloa reports high monthly volume, solid CSAT and accurate routing.

The problem

The service team faced heavy daily call volume that tripled in the spring peak. Wait times were long, and limited capacity put both service quality and staff under strain.

How they did it

  1. Connected the agents to inventory, e-commerce, CRM and logistics systems through standard APIs.
  2. Launched local agents by country: 'Paul' in Germany, 'Marek' in Poland and 'Balász' in Hungary.
  3. Had agents answer routine questions and route complex ones to human experts with context.
  4. Worked with integration partner MUUUH! on the implementation.

Results

  • Parloa reports 45,000 monthly inquiries handled by AI agents and 89% customer satisfaction (CSAT).
  • 20% automation rate (calls resolved end-to-end) and 99% routing accuracy.
  • In Poland, Marek has handled more than 100,000 inquiries, and shopping-by-phone volume rose by 30%.

As reported by the source (Parloa customer story); AgentGid did not measure these figures.

Takeaway. If the agent can't resolve a call, accurate routing with context still helps; track routing accuracy alongside automation rate.
AgentGid's take

This suits a large retailer with multi-country call volume, API access to inventory, CRM and logistics systems, and an integration partner, as OBI used. Parloa publishes no rates (usage-based, demo required), and the 20% automation rate, 89% CSAT and 99% routing figures are vendor-reported, so budget with care. For a smaller team, Rasa is Free for one bot up to 1,000 conversations a month and is open source.

The agent used here

Similar use cases