Skip to content
Agents tracked: 258 Downloads (7d): 219M up 6.1% GitHub stars: 5.5M VS Code installs: 148M Releases (7d): 293 Agent pull requests (last week): 937K Updated Oct 7, 2026
Case study CMS

How CMS rolled out Harvey to thousands of lawyers after a 12-month pilot

International law firm CMS piloted Harvey for twelve months, then scaled it across the firm for contract review, document analysis and knowledge synthesis. Harvey reports high adoption.

The problem

CMS leadership expected generative AI to change legal work and saw that clients already had similar tools. Simply handing lawyers a generic tool wasn't seen as enough.

How they did it

  1. Ran an initial trial, then a twelve-month pilot with 300 lawyers across several practice areas.
  2. Tested Harvey on live matters: reviewing contracts, summarizing documents and pulling insights from curated knowledge sources.
  3. Focused on hands-on onboarding and sharing real use cases rather than abstract training.
  4. Let lawyers share their own examples to build momentum across the firm.

Results

  • Harvey reports 95% adoption across 3,000+ lawyers during the initial rollout.
  • The deployment later scaled firmwide to 7,200 lawyers across 50+ countries.
  • Qualitatively, the source says teams review much larger document sets faster. It gives no time-saving figures.

As reported by the source (Harvey customer story); AgentGid did not measure these figures.

Takeaway. Pilot on real client matters and let early users spread concrete examples. Peer stories drove adoption more than mandates.
AgentGid's take

This suits large firms with a dedicated rollout team and the patience for a year-long pilot; CMS started with 300 lawyers before scaling. Harvey has no public pricing and is sold only through sales, and the 95% adoption figure is vendor-reported with no time-saving numbers. A smaller team could try Spellbook (Custom, with a 7-day free trial).

The agent used here

Similar use cases