Concat vs Hypit
Concat (Jareer A.) and Hypit (Hypit.AI) side by side on public data, as of Nov 7, 2026.
Hypit has 1.9x the GitHub stars of Concat (28.3K against 14.9K). Concat shipped 9 stable releases in the past 90 days. Hypit shipped 27 stable releases in the past 90 days.
Which should you choose?
Choose Concat if
- you want code you can read, fork or self-host (AGPL-3.0)
- you prefer the more widely used tool, with more docs and answers around (Gid Score 50 against 39)
Choose Hypit if
- you want to use your own model API key
- you want frequent updates (27 stable releases in 90 days against 9)
Built from documented features, official prices, status pages and usage data on this page; it does not judge output quality.
Side-by-side numbers
| Metric | Concat | Hypit |
|---|---|---|
| Gid Score | 50 | 39 |
| Usage data as of | Nov 7 | Nov 7 |
| Rank by Gid Score | #40 | #98 |
| Downloads, last 7 days | — | 14K |
| Downloads, 7-day change | — | up 27.0% |
| Downloads, 30-day change | — | — |
| VS Code installs | — | — |
| Marketplace rating | — | — |
| GitHub stars | 14.9K | 28.3K |
| Homebrew installs, 30 days | — | — |
| Hacker News mentions, 30 days | 0 | 0 |
| Latest stable release | 0.2.9 · 2d ago | 0.3.1 · 29d ago |
| Stable releases, 90 days | 9 | 27 |
| Terminal-Bench (best run) | — | — |
| Price | Free (OSS) | Free + $9.90/mo yearly |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Modified Apache-2.0 (no multi-tenant hosting or commercial redistribution without a licence) |
| First released | August 2026 | July 2026 |
| Interfaces | — | Web app, API, Agent skill |
| Models | — | — |
A dash means there is no public data for that metric as of Nov 7, 2026.
Trends
Concat
Beta: The truly free, open-source, local-first, cross-platform video editor. Scriptable through a JSON-RPC API & MCP.
Pricing: Open source under the AGPL-3.0 licence; check the website for any paid hosted plans.
Latest release 0.2.9:
- ✨ Transitions are clips. A transition sits on the timeline and is placed, moved and trimmed like any other clip, over a cut or on a single shot.
- ✨ Transparent projects. A clear background with a checker under the preview, or a background colour of your choice, and export with alpha as ProRes 4444 or VP9
- ✨ Chroma key that finds the screen itself, an eyedropper, Remove Black, and batch edits in the inspector
- 🗣️ Your own voice. Import a recording on the Voices shelf and keep it as a voice with a name, picture and description
Hypit
Toolkit that lets AI agents rebuild a reference video's shots, captions and effects around your own content and render many variants from one command; open core plus a hosted web app and API.
Pricing: The core is free to self-host under a modified Apache-2.0 licence. Web app: Starter $9.90, Pro $39.90 and Ultra $99.90 a month billed yearly (1,800, 10,000 and 27,000 credits a month); top-ups from $15 for 2,000 credits; custom plan for teams.
Latest release 0.3.1:
- Video-domain SDKs are independently versioned npm packages. Default video capabilities still install with Hypit; generic host APIs remain under @hypit/hypit.
- Studio resolves computed CaptionTiming references, displays named Instants even when no Track consumes them, and retains the compact unified Timeline header and projection rows.
- Studio observes atomic Source-file replacement and updates watches as the loaded Source closure changes.
- Pricing reports Producer failures completely and exits unsuccessfully when planning fails.
Concat vs Hypit: common questions
How do Concat and Hypit prices compare?
Concat: Free (OSS). Hypit: Free + $9.90/mo yearly. Prices come from each vendor's pricing page.
Is Concat or Hypit open source?
Concat is open source (AGPL-3.0); Hypit is source-available (Modified Apache-2.0).
Which is more popular, Concat or Hypit?
Concat has a Gid Score of 50 against 39 for Hypit. The score combines package downloads, editor installs, GitHub activity and attention, updated daily.