Checksum vs mabl
Checksum (Checksum) and mabl (mabl Inc.) side by side on public data, as of Oct 6, 2026.
Checksum has 1.3x the weekly package downloads of mabl (17.4K against 13.3K).
Side-by-side numbers
| Metric | Checksum | mabl |
|---|---|---|
| Pulse Score | 21 | 37 |
| Overall rank | #165 | #96 |
| Downloads, last 7 days | 17.4K | 13.3K |
| Downloads, 7-day change | up 20.8% | up 28.6% |
| Downloads, 30-day change | — | — |
| VS Code installs | — | — |
| Marketplace rating | — | — |
| GitHub stars | — | — |
| Homebrew installs, 30 days | — | — |
| Hacker News mentions, 30 days | 0 | 1,169 |
| Latest stable release | — | — |
| Stable releases, 90 days | ||
| Terminal-Bench (best run) | — | — |
| Price | Custom | Custom |
| License | ||
| First released | — | — |
| Interfaces | — | — |
| Models |
Trends
Checksummabl
Checksum
Generates Playwright end-to-end and API tests, runs them in CI and repairs failing tests automatically as the code changes.
Pricing: Priced by the number of workflows and tests maintained, with no per-seat or per-run fees; no public prices.
mabl
Creates, runs and repairs tests for web, mobile, API, accessibility and performance, and describes itself as an agentic testing platform.
Pricing: Custom pricing by quote, with unlimited local runs and cloud concurrency; 14-day free trial.