Bito vs Greptile
Bito (Bito Inc.) and Greptile (Tabnam, Inc.) side by side on public data, as of Oct 6, 2026.
Side-by-side numbers
| Metric | Bito | Greptile |
|---|---|---|
| Pulse Score | 34 | 34 |
| Overall rank | #113 | #115 |
| Downloads, last 7 days | — | 28.3K |
| Downloads, 7-day change | — | up 2.2% |
| Downloads, 30-day change | — | up 130.2% |
| VS Code installs | 952K | — |
| Marketplace rating | 4.2 / 5 (81) | — |
| GitHub stars | 67 | — |
| Homebrew installs, 30 days | — | — |
| Hacker News mentions, 30 days | 0 | 4 |
| Latest stable release | — | — |
| Stable releases, 90 days | ||
| Terminal-Bench (best run) | — | — |
| Price | Free + $12/mo | Free + $30/mo |
| License | ||
| First released | — | — |
| Interfaces | — | — |
| Models |
Bito
Runs codebase-aware AI reviews on pull requests in GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket and in the IDE, with an optional self-hosted Docker agent.
Pricing: Team $12 per seat a month billed annually ($15 monthly) and Professional $20 ($25 monthly); Enterprise custom. The docs list a free plan subject to fair use.
Greptile
Builds a graph index of a codebase and uses several agents to review pull requests for bugs, security issues and rule violations with full-repository context.
Pricing: Free Starter plan (1 active developer, 50 credits a month). Pro $30 per seat a month with 50 credits per seat; Enterprise custom. Free for OSI-licensed open source.