Flowith alternatives
Flowith by Flowith Technologies Pte. Ltd. costs Free + $19.90/mo and is proprietary. If you need something cheaper, open source, self-hosted or simply different, here are 10 alternatives that do the same job, ranked by how widely they are used, with the differences that matter.
10 Flowith alternatives, by popularity
-
Open-source personal AI assistant that runs on the user's own machine as a gateway and works through chat apps such as WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord and iMessage, with a skills system and swappable model plugins. It also ships native apps for macOS, iOS, Android and Windows.
- Open source (MIT)
- More widely used (Gid Score 80 vs 19)
- Growing fast: usage up 27% in 30 days
-
An agent harness from DeepSeek in which every capability is a plugin. Its agent reads and edits workspace files, runs commands, delegates work and keeps a plan, and it runs as a desktop app, a browser UI or the dsh command-line tool.
- Open source (MIT)
- More widely used (Gid Score 62 vs 19)
-
Open-source self-improving agent from Nous Research that keeps persistent memory, creates and refines skills from experience, runs scheduled automations, and works from a terminal interface or messaging apps such as Telegram, Discord, Slack and WhatsApp. It can run locally or on Docker, SSH, Modal and Daytona backends, and has a desktop app.
- Open source (MIT)
- More widely used (Gid Score 55 vs 19)
-
General-purpose autonomous agent that plans and runs multi-step tasks in a cloud sandbox, such as research, slides, websites and data analysis, with web, desktop, mobile and browser-extension clients. Manus 2.0, announced in September 2026, added a new agent harness, dedicated cloud computers and a desktop studio.
- More widely used (Gid Score 52 vs 19)
-
AI workspace built around a Super Agent that plans and runs multi-step tasks in a sandbox with a real browser and filesystem, producing slides, sheets, documents, research and websites. It also offers a Chrome extension, an AI browser, a Claw personal agent that can run in the cloud or locally, and in-house models such as Gen-1.
- Paid plans from $24.99/mo vs $19.9/mo
- More widely used (Gid Score 45 vs 19)
-
A lightweight, self-hosted personal agent runtime in Python that runs in a web UI, a terminal or chat apps, using shell, files, web, MCP and sub-agents, with long-term memory and scheduled automations.
- Open source (MIT)
- More widely used (Gid Score 40 vs 19)
- Growing fast: usage up 32% in 30 days
-
A self-hosted assistant designed to run on local models that can browse the web, write and run code and split tasks across specialised agents; it runs with Docker and supports optional cloud model APIs.
- Open source (GPL-3.0)
- More widely used (Gid Score 40 vs 19)
-
Platform for building, deploying and running AI agents through a chat-based AutoPilot, a visual builder and a marketplace, offered as a paid hosted service or self-hosted. The original 2023 autonomous agent remains in the repository as AutoGPT Classic.
- Paid plans from $50/mo vs $19.9/mo
- Open source (MIT AND LicenseRef-PolyForm-Shield-1.0.0)
- More widely used (Gid Score 38 vs 19)
-
A small Python agent that gives a model control of a local computer through the browser, terminal, files, keyboard and mouse, screen vision and Android ADB, and saves each completed task as a reusable skill.
- Open source (MIT)
- More widely used (Gid Score 35 vs 19)
-
Source-available 'AI operating system' that runs agents on cloud computers, each session in an isolated sandbox on its own git branch, with agents, skills, memory and connectors kept in one repository and work delivered through reviewable change requests. It works in Slack and Microsoft Teams, with any model provider and your own API keys, and grew out of the Suna agent project.
- Paid plans from $40/mo vs $19.9/mo
- More widely used (Gid Score 35 vs 19)
Flowith vs alternatives at a glance
| Agent | Price | Free to start | Open source | MCP | Local models | Gid Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flowith | Free + $19.90/mo | ✓ | ✕ | ? | ? | 19 |
| OpenClaw | Free (OSS) | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | 80 |
| DeepSeek Harness | Free | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | 62 |
| Hermes Agent | Free (OSS) | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | 55 |
| Manus | Free + $20/mo | ✓ | ✕ | ? | ? | 52 |
| Genspark | Free + $24.99/mo | ✓ | ✕ | ? | ? | 45 |
| nanobot | Free (OSS) | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | 40 |
| AgenticSeek | Free (OSS) | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | 40 |
| AutoGPT | Free + $50/mo | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | 38 |
| GenericAgent | Free (OSS) | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | 35 |
| Kortix | Free + $40/mo | ✓ | ✕ | ? | ? | 35 |
Prices from the vendors' pricing pages; features from official docs (“?” means not documented). Full feature comparison · All prices
How teams use these tools
FAQ
What is the best alternative to Flowith?
By usage, the closest alternative is OpenClaw, followed by DeepSeek Harness, Hermes Agent, Manus.
Is there a free alternative to Flowith?
None of the closest alternatives has a free tier.
Is there an open-source alternative to Flowith?
Not among the closest alternatives we track.
How do these Flowith alternatives compare on price?
OpenClaw: Free (OSS); DeepSeek Harness: Free; Hermes Agent: Free (OSS); Manus: Free + $20/mo; Genspark: Free + $24.99/mo; nanobot: Free (OSS).
Flowith: pricing, features and stats · All general-purpose AI agents · Find the right agent in 4 questions